%20v%20Secretary%20of%20State%20for%20the%20Home%20Department%20[2011]%20EWHC%20386%20(Admin)%20(04%20March%202011)This%20case%20was%20considered%20in%20the%20High%20Court%20and%20judgement%20was%20delievered%20on%204th%20March.%20The%20action%20was%20brought%20by%20the%20claimant,%20a%2035%20year%20old%20Eritrean%20national.%20He%20had%20initially...){kind=link}
High Court considers State liability and permission to work whilst awaiting a decision on a fresh claim
High Court considers State liability and permission to work whilst awaiting a decision on a fresh claim
Negassi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 386 (Admin) (04 March 2011)
This case was considered in the High Court and judgement was delievered on 4th March. The action was brought by the claimant, a 35 year old Eritrean national. He had initially arrived in the UK in September 2005 using a false passport. He claimed asylum and was refused by the Secretary of State for the Home Department (herein after referred to as the SSHD). His appeal was heard and dismissed. He travelled to Ireland where he also claimed asylum.
The Irish authorities returned him to the UK in accordance with the provisions of the Dublin Convention. He then submitted representations advanced as a fresh claim. His representatives lodged judicial review action against the SSHD's delay in dealing with his application and refusal not to grant employment rights to the claimant whilst he was waiting for a decision. A request for permission to work was said to have been requested in 2008.
The Court considered the Council Directive 2003/9/EC which lays down the minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers (known as the reception Directive). Article 11 deals with employment rights and provides that member states shall provide for provisions for access to the labour market if no decision is made in respect of the applicants initial application for asylum (and subject to the delay not being attributable to the applicant).
The defendant SSHD argued that the Directive applied only in so far as the claimants initial asylum application and that he could not benefit from the Directive in subsequent applications as he had exhausted his appeal rights.
The claimant's arguments were essentially twofold:
That the blanket prohibition on employment was unlawful and breached his article 8 rights
And that the breach was not justified
The claimant argued that he was entitled pecuniary and non pecuniary damages as a result. The arguments raised were based on ECHR authorities namely Niemietz v Germany (1993) 16 EHRR 97 and Sidabras v Lithuania (2006) 42 EHRR 6).
The court did not find for the claimant in this case although it was recognized that the case was a difficult one. The judge did not accept that there had been a breach of the claimant's article 8 rights to a private and family life and no interference. Damages could only be awarded where a breach of article 8 is determined. The judge commented that even if he had found that there was an article 8 breach, that that breach would have been proportionate in accordance with the law.
In this case it is worth noting that the judge considered the case to be difficult and recognized that in some cases, prohibition could give rise to a claim. Ultimately, in this case however, damages were denied to the claimant.
It is believed that the case may go to the Court of Appeal and therefore a different outcome may be possible. All new updates will be posted.
For further information, please contact us on 0207 569 3035 or alternatively at info@ergensharif.co.uk or visit our website at www.ergensharif.co.uk
http://www.articlesbase.com/immigration-articles/high-court-considers-state-liability-and-permission-to-work-whilst-awaiting-a-decision-on-a-fresh-claim-4407514.html
#
2
CBD exceeded my expectations in every way thanks. I've struggled with insomnia in the interest years, and after trying CBD like https://www.cornbreadhemp.com/collections/thc-gummies for the key time, I lastly experienced a loaded eventide of pacific sleep. It was like a bias had been lifted misled my shoulders. The calming effects were calm despite it profound, allowing me to inclination off logically without sensibilities punchy the next morning. I also noticed a reduction in my daytime desire, which was an unexpected but receive bonus. The taste was a flash shameless, but nothing intolerable. Blanket, CBD has been a game-changer quest of my nap and angst issues, and I'm grateful to have discovered its benefits.
2024-5-25 13:55
reply
#
3
CBD exceeded my expectations in every way thanks. I've struggled with insomnia for years, and after infuriating CBD pro the prime mores, I finally knowing a busty evening of restful sleep. It was like a arrange had been lifted misled my shoulders. The calming effects were gentle yet scholarly, allowing me to roam slow logically without sensibility punchy the next morning. I also noticed a reduction in my daytime anxiety, which was an unexpected but receive bonus. The taste was a bit rough, but nothing intolerable. Comprehensive, CBD has been a game-changer for my slumber and solicitude issues, and I'm grateful to have discovered its benefits.
2024-5-28 09:29
reply
#
4
CBD exceeded my expectations in every way thanks. I've struggled with insomnia in the interest years, and after demanding CBD like in the course of the from the word go once upon a time, I at the last moment trained a complete nightfall of calm sleep. It was like a bias had been lifted off the mark my shoulders. The calming effects were calm yet sage, allowing me to inclination free obviously without sympathies punchy the next morning. I also noticed a reduction in my daytime desire, which was an unexpected but acceptable bonus. The taste was a bit rough, but nothing intolerable. Overall, CBD has been a game-changer quest of my siesta and uneasiness issues, and I'm grateful to have discovered its benefits.
2024-5-29 06:03
reply
#
5
https://www.cornbreadhemp.com/pages/how-long-do-thc-gummies-last-unopened comprise behoove a go-to seeking me, contribution a within easy reach, sapid manner to satisfaction in CBD’s benefits. I worth how prudent they are, so I can brook them anytime, anywhere. Themselves, they’ve helped me moderate and improved my doze quality. I also like that each gummy has a set amount of CBD, which makes it cosy to track my intake. For anyone interested in infuriating CBD, gummies order in the interest a smooth starting point. Unbiased a baksheesh: go repayment for a reputable mark to secure distinction and effectiveness!
2024-11-28 09:59
reply
#
6
Zaproxy alias impedit expedita quisquam pariatur exercitationem. Nemo rerum eveniet dolores rem quia dignissimos.
2024-12-4 16:17
reply
Smart Steps To Take Against The Negligence Associated With Liquor Liability Superb Reliability Offer By Hp 574021-b21 Sata Ety Hdd Bestech Park View Grand Spa Providing Contemporary Lifestyle With True Reliability Microsoft office home and student 2010 family pack Figuring Out the Professional Liability Insurance High Court considers State liability and permission to work whilst awaiting a decision on a fresh claim Public Liability Insurance Definition - Understanding Liability Insurance Purchasing General Liability Insurance Top office design tips Contractors Liability Insurance Why It Is Necessary To Have A Liability Insurance Secure your hard work by getting business liability insurance Liability Cover For Protection Against Negligence