Obama and McCain - Does Wall Street Know Who Could Bring Back Market Confidence? by:Dominic Mazzone
Election campaigns are in high gear right now and everyone has an opinion on just
about everything when it comes to which candidate would be better for who and what. I lost faith in the common sense of the average voter, not just in the United States but pretty much across the world. What I am finding very curious, is the possibility that many people haven't realized that that the party platforms aren't the same as they were 20 years ago. Little do they know that the platforms have changed right under their nose. One of the greatest examples of this is the never ending pigeon holing claiming that Republicans are good for business and Wall Street while keeping the government small, and the Democrats are anti-business and will spell doom for Wall Street while expanding the government to goliath proportions. In full disclosure, I usually have views that seem a bit more republican in nature but since I didn't disable the reasoning portion of my cerebrum for the last 8 years, I have views that are based on rational judgment instead of a bias based on a political party.
No matter what you think a party represents, one must ask themselves which presidential candidate would be best suited to carry the United States out of the dilemma we now face. If you breakdown the dire issues within the global economies that have shown themselves like a scene from a doomsday movie, it comes down to one very fundamental issue; who can reestablish confidence? It's so important to understand that government interventions, nationalizations, liquidity injections, and bailouts are all being done to increase confidence. Increasing confidence in the banks leads to lending, which increases confidence in businesses to do more business, which in turn increases the confidence of investors to push more money into these businesses, which then allow these businesses to hire more people who end up feeling confident enough to by products. Rinse and repeat and you now have economies humming along with a healthy amount of confidence. This was the one point that Paulson and Bernanke totally nailed when presenting the bailout package to Congress. Confidence is crushed because there is no faith in the system, and there are no government regulations or controls in place to give investors within the credit markets any confidence that things are going to be any different after the bailout. Not to mention that other countries around the world who so graciously invest in the United States need to have confidence that the U.S. Government is in control of its own markets.
So, follow and indulge me on a line of thinking. If confidence is important and, like school children, the financial world needs to know who is in charge to gain some confidence, wouldn't a little bit of government regulation be a good thing at this time? Wall Street analysts are running around yelling that Obama would be detrimental to the markets because he would enact more regulation. Wouldn't instilling some regulation tell everyone, "Yes, we know where this whole thing went wrong and we are putting measures in place to assure it doesn't happen again?" Not only are the financial institutions, its investors, and the markets as a whole trying to figure out HOW they are going to function after they have clean balance sheets from the bailout, but also WHO is going to tell them what the rules of engagement are. This needs to come from the government and a strong government at that. A word of caution on this one though; I used the word "little" when describing the amount of regulation, because it is important to get it just right or risk causing further damage by taking it too far . Also, any increase in capital gains tax would be a mistake in my opinion. However, I think investors could argue that it's better to have a healthy economy and market that you can profit from compared to what we are experiencing now. Needless to say, capital gains become a moot point when you are losing money on your investments. I think a lot of my republican colleagues are going through mental civil war on this one, but I assure you they are not alone. I am strongly against any type of regulation that interferes with the smooth natural flow of commerce, but I have to pause because the recent lesson is a game changer. The market is like a running animal right now and begging for a clear definition of its boundaries. Who is better suited to create those boundaries? McCain or Obama? At this point, it is one guess after another.
Keep this in mind. If you want to have a healthy bull market, you need to keep the bull around. The only way to do that is to start building fences. Let's just hope whoever builds the fence gets the size just right.
About the author
Copyright: Dominic Mazzone, Regent Global Funds 2008
This article was written by Dominic Mazzone, Managing Partner and Fund Manager of Regent Global Funds.
This article and other like it can be viewed at
http://www.investingsymposium.com which is part of the Regent Global Funds Network.
Regent Global Funds,
http://www.rgfunds.com, is an alternative investment fund that offers its participating investors and asset backed investment through asset based lending.
The Fund Managers of Regent Global Funds have an expertise in commercial real estate lending and have created a successful alternative investment vehicle that is diversified through this structure.
They separate themselves from other fund mangers by personally investing their own money side-by-side with their investors in the fund, creating an absolute structure of accountability. Dominic Mazzone has written about the need for this type of accountability in an article titled "Fund Managers Need to be Accessible and Personally Invested."
http://www.articlecity.com/articles/business_and_finance/article_10427.shtml
Identifying a Ponzi Scheme - The Nugget of Glass in a Bowl of Diamonds by:Dominic Mazzone Technology's Effect on Commercial Real Estate in a Recession by:Dominic Mazzone Commercial Real Estate Values After the Bubble - The Word on the Street by:Dominic Mazzone The Golden Rule of Lending - How Banks Got it Wrong by:Dominic Mazzone OPEC Misses a Public Relations Opportunity by:Dominic Mazzone Downsizing to Death is Not an Alternative to Growth by:Dominic Mazzone Running For Cover - Private Alternative Investment Funds Could Be the Safest Haven by:Dominic Mazzone How to turn problems into money Hard Money is Becoming Harder by:Dominic Mazzone Empowering Entrepreneurs: Purchasing Co-ops Give Small Businesses An Edge by:Donna Abernathy The Meaning Of (IT) Life by:Dr. Jim Anderson Advancing Organizational Effectiveness Through Understanding and Taming Corporate Frauds: The Heart of the Matter by:Dr. Oladele Akin-Ogundeji Pushing Success - The Kabbalistic Way by:Itzhak Mizrahi
Obama and McCain - Does Wall Street Know Who Could Bring Back Market Confidence? by:Dominic Mazzone Copenhagen